Cell Biology This
Week
This week, many papers
caught my eye so I’m trying a different approach, i.e. writing less about
more. If you prefer one style to the
other, please feel free to leave a comment.
There have been several papers recently describing different
mechanisms by which proteins enter the primary cilium. There have been tantalizing clues in the
literature (for example Fan et al.)
that have indicated functions for nuclear import machinery in targeting
proteins to the cilium. Dishinger et al.
now provide definitive evidence for this idea through their analysis of ciliary
targeting of the intraflagellar transport motor Kif17. Their results support a model in which a
complex of Kif17 and importin beta2 in the cytoplasm crosses into the cilium
where the presence of RanGTP triggers their dissociation. Elsewhere, Hu et al.
show that a septin diffusion barrier controls the entry of proteins into the
cilium. And finally, Jin et al.
show that the BBSome, together with the small GTPase Arl6, assemble a coat complex
similar to the COPII or clathrin coats, to shepherd proteins into the
cilium. It’s been busy times for this
organelle! It will be interesting to see
whether and how these different targeting methods intersect and how the roles
of importins and septins at the cilium are balanced with their other functions
in the cell.
Moving on to more biophysical considerations, Block et al. show that the presence of a cell edge is sufficient to activate EGFR signaling to promote wound healing in epithelial sheets. Meanwhile, Connelly et al. examine how cell shape affects differentiation of human epidermal skin cells. They find that when they restrict cell spreading (using micropatterned substrates), the actin cytoskeleton and serum growth factors trigger transcriptional responses to promote differentiation.
Finally, I want to point your attention to a study that is a
nice example of how both environmental and genetic insults can work together to
contribute to disease and that also has obvious therapeutic implications. Cadwell et al. show that in a mouse model for Crohn’s disease (carrying a mutation of the
Crohn’s susceptibility gene Atg16L1—for
more information about this gene, see the review by Saitoh and Akira), are more
likely to develop symptoms and pathology of the disease, in response to a
toxin, if they have been infected by particular strain of murine norovirus
(MNV). Furthermore, commensal gut
bacteria are also involved in disease progression. The presence of multiple contributing factors
could explain the variation in symptoms and susceptibility in patients.
For more details about
Cell Biology This Week, click here.

Comments